FG MultiHex Inherent FP Fire at one target and SW MG Fire on Another [Réglé]

[Exaercase]

Bonjour,

    J'avais déjà posté, mais il semble que la forme de mon post a du posé un problème, car il a été effacer alors, je ne vais pas copier le mail a MPP - Perry Coke qui a valider comme Juste et vrais, mon Induction Tiré de 3 règles complémentaires, que de nombreux joueurs avec qui j'ai joué considérais comme fausse. Je mettrai juste sa réponse ultra-courte en fin seulement pour indiquer : Q&A Acquise et Validé par Perry Coke, j'espère que sous cette forme ça vous conviendra mieux :

Question à MPP - Perry Coke :
   

Dear Mr. Cocke,

I would like to ask for a rules clarification regarding a specific situation in the Prep Fire Phase of Advanced Squad Leader, for which I could not find a clear answer in the Rulebook or Q&A documents.

Here is the situation:

I have four squads, each in a separate but adjacent hex, all of the same nationality.

Each squad possesses a Light Machine Gun (LMG).

All squads are in Good Order and eligible to fire.

During the same Prep Fire Phase, I would like to:

Form a Fire Group (FG) with the inherent FP of the four squads, firing at Target A.

Simultaneously, form a second Fire Group with the four LMGs, firing together at a different Target B.

In other words:

Each squad is using two weapons in the same phase: its inherent FP and its SW (LMG), which is normally allowed according to A7.351.

The inherent FPs are grouped into a valid FG and attack a single Location.

The LMGs are also grouped into a separate FG and fire at another Location.

There is no rules conflict in terms of stacking, no duplication of fire, and each FG respects the one-target rule (A7.55).

I understand that restrictions about using multiple weapons apply more strictly in Defensive Fire Phases, but I see no explicit prohibition of this setup in the Prep Fire Phase rules.

Is this kind of action legal under official ASL rules?

Thank you very much for your time and clarification.

Sincerely,
ExA

Answer Quick but clear Perry Coke :
   

Perfectly fine.

....Perry
MMP

    I have added in respond to this mail a suggest to integrated as a real Q&A in the Official Q&A because, is for him is evident for most of player i have encounter it's not.


Cordialement, ExA

[Robin Reeve]

La notion de "weapon" est étrange.
Il s'agit d'"attacks".
Le mandatory FG s'applique en lien avec une Target, en effet.
La question me semble pouvoir être réduite à : can a squad fire its IFP at a Target and a SW at another one?

[Phil D]

Je ne comprends pas pourquoi, le texte du mail ne s'affiche pas en coupant les lignes, résultat c'est impossible de le lire sans faire un zoom qui me tue les yeux.