Réponse de Perry... Je vous laisse décortiquer...
D 6.24 says : "Bailing Out never costs the transport any MP but for Defensive First Fire purposes the Rider is considered to spend all remaining (but at least one) MF subject to FFNAM."
1) Is that MF expense considered as part of the resolution of the fire that caused the Bailing Out?
1a) Is then the residual fire of the shot that made the unit Bail Out placed after the MF expense?
1b) Would that mean that other DFF only occurs vs the rider after his Bailing Out, on the expended MFs (minimum 1 MF) of the Bailing Out, using FFNAM vs the unit which now is Infantry?
1) No.
1a) No, before.
1b) Follow-up DFF can occur against either the pre-Bail Out MP or against the post-Bail Out MF; the target would still have it's post-Bail Out status though in either case.
2) If hat MF expense is NOT considered as part of the resolution of the fire that caused the Bailing Out, could the Bailing Out riders be attacked by the residual fire that caused the Bailing Out?
2a) Would such an attack by RF only occur if DRM are less than when the Rider was initially fired at, when still a rider?
2c) Would that mean that other Defensive Fire could be taken against the Riders, before they Bail Out?
2) Yes, if it is subject to more-negative/less-positive DRM (A8.22). Note though that in addition to FFNAM, the target
ill usually get AFV TEM as well.
2a) Yes, a second attack by RFF would require worse DRMbasically.
2c) No, just like if a shot breaks a unit then for all other shots it is in it's broken state.
....Perry
MMP
